Official Definition:
Micro Frontends is a design approach where a frontend app is broken into smaller, semi-independent “micro apps” that can be developed, deployed, and scaled separately — just like microservices in the backend world.
Module Federation, introduced with Webpack 5, allows JavaScript applications to dynamically load code from other applications at runtime. Angular 19 has taken this a notch higher with streamlined support, standalone components, and lazy loading baked in.
In a multi-tenant setup, the same core app is served to multiple clients (tenants), each with customized branding, features, and access control — without deploying separate instances per client.
Let’s Get to It
Okay, let’s skip the buzzwords.
Imagine you’re running an online learning platform. You have 20 schools onboard, and each wants its own logo, theme, dashboard widgets, and maybe some custom reports.
Do you:
- Clone the app 20 times?
- Add 20 if-else statements everywhere in code?
- Or… break it into micro frontends and load just what each tenant needs, on the fly?
With Angular 19 + Module Federation, each part of your UI — Dashboard, Profile, Reports — can be a separate app. The main shell (layout) loads the right pieces dynamically depending on which tenant logs in. You control branding, routes, and even features — per tenant, per module.
In short: cleaner separation, faster updates, happier devs.
High-Level Implementation
- Shell App (Host): Handles layout, routing, and tenant detection. Loads remote modules dynamically.
- Remote Apps (Micro Frontends): Feature-specific Angular apps. Expose entry points with Webpack’s
exposes. - Tenant Configuration Service: JSON or API-driven feature toggles, branding, and rules per tenant.
- Shared Component Libraries: Common UI components and styling tokens.
- Routing Strategy: Shell handles master routing; remote apps load lazily and independently.
- Branding & Theming: Angular CDK + SCSS with dynamic CSS tokens loaded per tenant.
- CI/CD & Deployment: Each micro app has its own pipeline. Shell fetches remote entrypoints from an environment-configurable registry.
⚖️ How It Helps
| Feature | Traditional SPA | Micro Frontends with Module Federation |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Monolithic, risky | Independent, safe |
| Branding Per Tenant | Complex, code-heavy | Config-driven, dynamic |
| Team Autonomy | Shared repo, bottlenecks | Separate repos, parallel velocity |
| Tech Upgrade | One giant leap | Module-by-module |
| Load Time | Full bundle upfront | Lazy-loaded per route |
| Debugging | All-in-one mess | Scoped and local |
Advantages:
- Each team owns a domain end-to-end
- Less coordination overhead
- Safer deployments
- Real-time customization by tenant
Drawbacks:
- Initial setup complexity
- Shared state management needs strategy
- Runtime dependency mismatches (e.g., ag-grid, PrimeNG)
In Essence
- Use Angular 19’s standalone components to simplify modules.
- Use Module Federation for dynamic remote app loading.
- Apply config-driven theming and routing per tenant.
- Use independent CI/CD for each micro app.
- Share common libraries via
sharedMappings.
On a Funny Note
“Building a monolith in 2025 is like using a fax machine to send memes. It works… but why!?”
Bibliography
- Angular Official Docs on Module Federation
- Webpack Module Federation Guide
- Nx.dev Micro Frontends Guide
- Community posts by Manfred Steyer
- First-hand implementation notes from enterprise Angular apps (Fintech/EdTech)
Muses of a Reticent Techie 
Leave a comment